thoughts, feelings and the perceived world

i think it was schopenhauer who said there is but a miniscule degree between extreme heat and extreme cold. i dont agree with this

from my point of view, there is no difference between any object

all 'difference' exists within the apparent organism

you can think anything you want about a thing. no matter how hard you try, the relationship between yourself and the object doesnt change. it cannot change. it is completely fixed. the only thing that changes is the thought and feelings/sensations which are 'triggered' as we relate to the object.

there is nothing here, other than an organism perceiving a difference between objects and as a result (through time) changing its relationship to itself in relation to that difference, via feelings and sensations which reinforce and validate the initial thought

an emotion is a sustained oscillation between thoughts and feelings

we can have an emotional reaction to a 'thing' eg, to be disgusted by racism. the only thing happening here is this dance between thoughts and feelings. this dance is the only thing that can create a difference between events as varied as witnessing a racist act and eating ice cream

as i walk up a flight of stairs, this organism has a physical response, it can become tired. what happens here is that the flight of stairs falls into the background of perception and the organism relates to itself in motion, by becoming tired. the organism then 'thinks' that motion via the (perceived) 'staircase' is responsible for the 'sense' of it 'feeling tired'

the light of the outside world does not travel 'into' and act upon the organism. i dont fully know how to explain this yet, but i know that it is not what is happening

within the 'idea' of an organism, there exists the cortex for perception (so we believe). the organism perceives difference in the imaginary outside world and changes its relationship to itself (via thoughts and 'sense' feelings) as a product of this illusory difference. this is the basis of the world which changes - it only changes for the organism. there is nothing outside, but the same thing..

HOW TO CREATE THIS THING CALLED REALITY

imagine an organism which perceives variation where none exists

change the organisms relationship to itself, by making thought malleable

give feelings the 'power' to reinforce thought and vice versa

there doesnt need to be 6 billion people, an earth or universe

there only need be one organism perceiving 'different' things at different 'times'
including the perception of other organisms. when in truth there will only be the one

the organism will 'think' it sees events and other organisms. it will feel different things based on its individuality when this happens

the organism will think its on a planet and that this planet is a part of a system of planets at different times of its existence. this will not be the case. the 'totality of its existence will be represented by the immediate events happening in the 'present' moment. one example of this could be a journey to a place. this 'journey' is the totality of existence for that 'person' at that 'time', another example could be the arrival to the place the person was travelling to, this event is the totality of its existence at that 'moment'. the journey does not 'lead' to the place - they are not connected. they are totalities of themselves. they will be replaced by different 'totalities' at 'different' (so called) times. these totalities do not happen on a planet, there is no planet until there is the 'perception' of a planet, the perception which represents its own totality at that moment

the organism may marvel at the wonder of its existence, but the thing is..

this 'marvel' is but a thought, triggering a feeling

repulsion is attraction and repulsion

you cannot be repulsed by a thing

unless attraction brings
it close enough for you to be
repulsed by it

what if? is nothing more than what if?

we treat 'what if?' as if we are about to embrace a fork in the road,
foreseeing our perceived desire and its opposite (which we do, or do not want)

'what if?' is an entity of itself

it does not stand between opposing desires

it does not embrace, or offer 'choice'


'what if?' is a thought which triggers feelings of uncertainty, or vice versa

the two harmonize, through feeding from eachother

this fades, only when we are confronted with the reality
of what was always going to 'happen'

is there the precognition of this 'happening'?

yes, a precognition is realized as 'theory' through a thought embracing
the opposite of the perceived desire

the thought perceived as 'theory' triggers the emotion of uncertainty,
which in turn prepares a person for the reality to come

'what if?' is a shimmering vessel of uncertainty and insecurity

it is perfect


and temporary

it is as temporary as the thing it prepares us for